In tush Rawls objection to utilitarianism, he states that it does not take seriously the billet between persons. Jeremy Benthams description does not in occurrence acknowledge the pleasure of an individual in a community, if single to state that an individuals pleasure will and be added to the eventual sum of everybodys pleasure, determining the happiness of the community. If an individuals pleasure is extremely low, it will not matter from a utilitarianists point of view, as ache as the sum of everyones pleasure in a community is maximized. To restate John Rawls, utilitarianism does not acknowledge individuals who may suffer in order to maximize the happiness of a community.
To state John Rawls objection more precisely, one must(prenominal) consider an individual whose act of suffering is an act that maximizes the happiness of his or her community. This individual chooses to suffer because he or she is a utilitarianist who believes that it is skillful to suffer if suffering maximizes the happiness of his or her community. be a utilitarianist, this individual would also believe that it would be right not to suffer and to maximize his or her pleasure if he or she was not a member of the community. The utilitarianist certainly would not make painful decisions to him or herself if he or she was not part of a community. Therefore, it is community that can...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.