RELEVANT FACTS - Lopez was a high school student - Lopez brought a gun to school - He was convicted under the Guns Free discipline Zone Act - The Commerce Clause was the key element on which Lopez was convicted - US Supreme Court upheld the overturn of Lopezs conviction explanatory FACTS - Lopez was non engaging in, nor did he any intent to pick push through in any interstate commerce by bring the gun to school - By enforcing the Commerce Clause in this instance, Congress would have exceed its baron given to them in the clause LEGALLY UNIMPORTANT FACTS - State charges were dropped when Lopez was charged federally C. Issue in US v. Lopez Was Lopez in direct violation of the Guns Free develop Zone Act of 1990 based on Congress power to flummox under the Commerce Clause? -Chief nicety Rehnquist identified 3 categories under which Congress could regulate: impart of commerce, inst rumentalities of interstate commerce, and ac! tivities that substantially affect interstate commerce. barely the 3rd category was looked at for this case. -There was no proof that Lopezs act affected interstate commerce in any way. -The carrying of handguns is not a commercial activity in to the highest form cases. -Reversing the decision would have given Congress too such(prenominal) power in...If you want to get a full essay, order of strife it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.